If Not God, Then What?

Neuroscience, Aesthetics, and the Origins of the Transcendent

"Highly accessible…Fost demonstrates the importance of neuroscience to considerations of the most extraordinary forms of aesthetic, religious, and scientific experience." - Francisca Cho, Professor of Theology, Georgetown Univ.

Description

If Not God, Then What cover

In If Not God, Then What? theoretical neuroscientist Joshua Fost shows how the search for beauty is the source of both religious experience and scientific theorizing. The pleasure of seeing a beautiful face, the thrill of understanding a new idea, the sublimity of art and the power of religious transformation are all, in the end, the result of a brain that wants to make sense of the world. Weaving ideas from brain science and everyday activities — from Sunday cartoons to existentialism — Fost shows how a biological idiosyncrasy motivates them all. But if religious experience is just a special activity pattern in neurons, what should we think about its undeniable and emotionally transformative power? If everything we do is determined by physics, what is the basis for free will, or ethics? Blending receptivity to the glory of spiritual exultation with an insistence on naturalistic foundations, If Not God, Then What? breaks new ground and gives its readers insight into a compelling new worldview.

Excerpts

"For a naturalist, metaphysical precepts are just as inscrutable as those based on faith. Where do metaphysical precepts come from? They come from the hands and mouths of metaphysicians. And where did the motions of those hands and mouths come from? From the brain." - page 153

"…Your brain and the consciousness it produces are machines. The brain is a very fancy, biological, recursive, adaptive, self-aware machine, made out of lipid bilayers and sodium channels, but a machine nonetheless. It is a wonder to behold. To many who understand this, it is in fact far more wonderful than the unsupportable positing of an immaterial will, which itself is incomprehensible and explains nothing. This is, in miniature, the difference between the naturalistic and the supernatural worldviews. "- page 134-135